Product · traceability as a design principle
A production system for property valuations under Austrian law (LBG, ÖNORM B 1802-1). A spreadsheet can compute a value. What is hard is the auditable path from data source to signed number — and having the same report come out exactly the same way years later.
The problem
A valuation has to hold up in court, at the bank and before one’s own profession. What gets examined is not the number but how it came about.
The methods
§ 9 LBG requires the choice of method to be justified and signed. The system proposes, the valuer decides.
§ 4 LBG
Comparables with justification — the excluded ones appear in the report too, with the reason why.
§ 5 LBG
Income, operating costs and remaining useful life, including Austrian rent-law regimes.
§ 6 LBG
Land and building value kept apart, depreciation derived transparently.
ÖNORM B 1802-3
For development land: what the site supports once the project is costed.
ÖNORM B 1802-2
Cash flows across the holding period, every assumption justified on its own.
§ 2 LBG
When the economic unit is broken up — plus mortgage lending value under BelWertV for the bank.
The difference
| AI VALUATION OS | AUTOMATED ESTIMATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Provenance of each number | ●Source and justification carried along | ●A result with no path |
| Re-run years later | ●Bit for bit identical | ●New data, new result |
| Who computes | ●Deterministic, versioned | ●The model estimates |
| Uncertainty | ●Stated — or not claimed at all | ●One number, smooth |
| Who signs | ●The human, with logged override | ●Nobody |
Where it stands
The system is built and thoroughly tested; what it needs now are valuers as design partners to check it against real, anonymised case files. Deep-dive on request.